Iowa Senate Bill SSB3171

Iowa 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/12/24
• Refer: 2/12/24

Caption

A bill for an act relating to computer science instruction, including by modifying provisions related to the graduation requirements, the computer science instruction provided to students enrolled in grades nine through twelve, computer science instruction endorsements and authorizations issued by the board of educational examiners, and the computer science professional development incentive fund.(See SF 2332.)

Impact

The bill reinforces the importance of computer science in preparing students for the modern workforce, aligning educational outcomes with the demands of a technology-driven economy. It aims to ensure that all high school students are equipped with essential skills such as problem-solving and critical thinking, which are crucial for success in high-wage jobs. Additionally, the bill introduces accountability measures, requiring school districts to report annual data on computer science instruction and to publish information on acceptable courses that fulfill the new graduation requirement.

Summary

SSB3171 is a legislative proposal aimed at enhancing computer science education within the Iowa school system. The bill modifies existing provisions regarding graduation requirements by mandating that all students graduating in the 2028-2029 school year and onward complete at least one semester of computer science coursework. This requirement can be fulfilled through various teaching methods, including traditional classroom instruction, blended learning, or primarily online formats, catering to diverse learning environments and accessibility needs.

Contention

One notable aspect of SSB3171 is its provision for waivers. Schools may apply for waivers from the graduation requirement if necessary, particularly for students transferring from out-of-state schools. The debate surrounding the bill is expected to focus on access to quality computer science instruction and whether the current educational infrastructure can adequately support the expanded requirements without additional funding. Critics may raise concerns about the equitable distribution of resources needed to implement these changes successfully across various districts.