Illinois 2023-2024 Regular Session

Illinois House Bill HB2274

Introduced
2/9/23  
Refer
2/14/23  
Introduced
2/9/23  
Refer
2/23/23  
Refer
2/14/23  
Report Pass
3/8/23  
Refer
2/23/23  
Engrossed
3/24/23  
Report Pass
3/8/23  
Refer
3/27/23  
Engrossed
3/24/23  
Refer
4/12/23  
Refer
3/27/23  
Report Pass
4/20/23  
Refer
4/12/23  
Enrolled
5/11/23  
Report Pass
4/20/23  
Enrolled
5/11/23  
Chaptered
7/28/23  
Chaptered
7/28/23  

Caption

SPEECH/LANG ASSIST-FIELD WORK

Impact

This legislative change is expected to have a positive impact on the training and certification of speech-language pathology assistants, ensuring that they meet specific criteria before obtaining a license. By clarifying the qualifications and requirements, the bill aims to enhance the professional standards within the field, which can subsequently improve the quality of care provided to individuals requiring speech and language assistance. Additionally, the bill permits consideration of moral character in licensing, addressing concerns related to the professionalism of individuals entering this workforce.

Summary

House Bill 2274 focuses on the regulation of licensing for speech-language pathology assistants in the state of Illinois. The bill amends the Illinois Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology Practice Act, specifically updating Section 8.5 to outline the qualifications needed for individuals seeking to be licensed as speech-language pathology assistants. This includes stipulating the necessary educational background and fieldwork experience, emphasizing the importance of completing documented fieldwork under a licensed speech-language pathologist's supervision.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 2274 appears to be predominantly positive among lawmakers, as evidenced by the unanimous support during voting, where the bill passed with 56 votes in favor and none against. This indicates a strong consensus on the need for higher standards in the profession. However, there may be minor critiques regarding the inclusivity of moral character assessments in determining licensure, which some may view as a barrier for individuals with past convictions potentially seeking to enter the profession.

Contention

While the bill is largely championed for promoting rigorous standards, notable points of contention could arise from discussions about how moral character is evaluated in licensing decisions. Critics might argue that such assessments could unfairly restrict access to licensure for qualified individuals with past legal issues that do not impact their ability to perform their job. Overall, the bill illustrates a trend toward enhancing the professional framework surrounding speech-language pathology and audiology, ensuring a workforce that is not only well-trained but also held to certain ethical standards.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.