Illinois 2023-2024 Regular Session

Illinois House Bill HB2392

Introduced
2/14/23  
Refer
2/15/23  
Introduced
2/14/23  
Refer
2/21/23  
Refer
2/15/23  
Report Pass
3/1/23  
Refer
2/21/23  
Engrossed
3/21/23  
Report Pass
3/1/23  
Refer
3/23/23  
Engrossed
3/21/23  
Refer
4/12/23  
Refer
3/23/23  
Report Pass
5/10/23  
Refer
4/12/23  
Enrolled
5/19/23  
Report Pass
5/10/23  
Enrolled
5/19/23  
Chaptered
7/28/23  
Chaptered
7/28/23  

Caption

SCH CD-LAST TEACHER EVALUATION

Impact

The inclusion of this measure in Illinois law signifies a commitment to support teachers' involvement in broader advocacy efforts at the federal level. By protecting teachers from wage penalties for participation in advocacy, HB2392 encourages greater engagement among educators in policy discussions that affect their profession and student outcomes. This could lead to a stronger unified voice on educational issues at the national level, potentially influencing legislation that impacts local schools and education systems.

Summary

House Bill 2392 introduces an amendment to the School Code in Illinois, specifically adding Section 24-3.5, which allows teachers who are members of a statewide association to participate in federal advocacy work. This provision enables elected representatives from these associations to take up to 10 days of school time for federal advocacy without having their wages deducted. Furthermore, the bill mandates that the employing school district will be reimbursed by the statewide association for the costs incurred in hiring substitute teachers during the absence of the member.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding this bill appears largely positive, particularly among educational professionals and teacher associations. Proponents argue that the ability for educators to advocate without fear of financial penalty strengthens democratic processes and improves educational policy. However, there may be concerns from some school administrators regarding the impact on staffing and classroom management when teachers take extended absences for advocacy work.

Contention

While there is a general support for the principle of advocacy, debates may arise about the implications on classroom continuity and the practicality of covering for absent teachers. Opponents may raise questions about the appropriate amount of time allotted for advocacy and how this aligns with educational priorities and classroom needs. Nonetheless, the support from the teaching profession suggests that the bill addresses a critical need for representation in federal educational policy discussions.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.