Illinois 2023-2024 Regular Session

Illinois House Bill HB3643

Introduced
2/17/23  
Introduced
2/17/23  
Refer
2/28/23  
Refer
2/17/23  
Report Pass
3/9/23  
Refer
2/28/23  
Engrossed
3/22/23  
Report Pass
3/9/23  
Refer
3/23/23  
Engrossed
3/22/23  
Refer
4/12/23  
Refer
3/23/23  
Refer
4/28/23  
Refer
4/12/23  
Refer
4/28/23  
Refer
4/28/23  
Report Pass
5/17/23  
Report Pass
5/17/23  
Enrolled
5/27/23  
Enrolled
5/27/23  
Vetoed
8/11/23  
Failed
11/8/23  
Vetoed
8/11/23  

Caption

SCH CD-IEP-VOTER REGISTRATION

Impact

The bill's introduction sparked discussions regarding the practicality and implications of having a centralized contract for religious dietary needs. However, it drew significant criticism for placing the onus on the State Board of Education, which would be responsible for executing a contract without assured funding. Opponents argued that local school districts possess the expertise to establish their own food service agreements and can customize meal options according to the specific cultural needs of their students. This local control is vital in maintaining responsiveness to community requirements.

Summary

House Bill 3643 aimed to amend the School Code to require the Illinois State Board of Education to enter into a master contract to provide religious dietary options for students across all Illinois school districts. The intent of the bill was to ensure that students who require culturally appropriate meals could access such options, thereby promoting inclusivity in school dining services. It recognized the importance of addressing the dietary needs of a diverse student population through regulated meal provisions.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 3643 was mixed, reflecting a divide between those who supported the intentions behind the bill and those who questioned its feasibility. Supporters emphasized the importance of providing culturally relevant meals to students, thereby enhancing their school experience. Conversely, the veto by Governor JB Pritzker pointed to a lack of practical execution and funding, indicating a more cautious perspective on state intervention in local school matters.

Contention

The primary contention surrounding HB 3643 lay in the balance between providing necessary dietary options for students and the practicality of enforcing a master contract at the state level. Critics pointed out that without allocated funding, the bill was destined to fail, thus relegating it to a symbolic gesture rather than an actionable plan. The discussions highlighted tensions between state oversight and local autonomy, raising essential questions about the role of state education administrations in addressing localized educational needs.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB954

Dental services: third-party network access.

DC B25-0265

Contract No. GAGA-2022-C-0259 with SodexoMagic, LLC Approval and Payment Authorization Emergency Act of 2023

TX SB543

Relating to oversight of and requirements applicable to state contracts and other state financial and accounting issues; authorizing fees.

TX HB1426

Relating to certain requirements applicable to contracts entered into by, and the contract management process of, state agencies.

CA SB681

Public employees’ retirement: contracting agencies: termination.

CA AB848

Public contracts: University of California: California State University: domestic workers.

CA AB2557

Local agencies: contracts for special services and temporary help: performance reports.

MI SB0281

Insurance: health insurers; granting third party access to a dental network contract; allow. Amends 1956 PA 218 (MCL 500.100 - 500.8302) by adding sec. 3406aa.