Illinois 2023-2024 Regular Session

Illinois House Bill HB4789

Introduced
2/5/24  
Refer
2/6/24  
Introduced
2/5/24  
Refer
2/14/24  
Refer
2/6/24  
Report Pass
4/2/24  
Refer
2/14/24  
Engrossed
4/16/24  
Report Pass
4/2/24  
Refer
4/17/24  
Engrossed
4/16/24  
Refer
4/24/24  
Refer
4/17/24  
Report Pass
5/1/24  
Refer
4/24/24  
Enrolled
5/25/24  
Report Pass
5/1/24  
Enrolled
5/25/24  
Chaptered
8/9/24  
Chaptered
8/9/24  

Caption

INS CD-DENTAL PREAUTHORIZATION

Impact

The implementation of HB4789 will significantly impact how dental carriers operate within the state, particularly in their interactions with healthcare providers. By requiring advance notifications and the establishment of specific conditions under which a claim may be denied, it aims to protect healthcare providers from arbitrary decisions by insurance companies. This is expected to lead to a more equitable environment for dental professionals and their patients, potentially improving access to dental care services.

Summary

House Bill 4789 focuses on amendments to the Illinois Insurance Code concerning dental services. It addresses the procedures surrounding prior authorizations for dental procedures, ensuring that dental carriers must provide clear guidelines on claim approvals and the conditions under which claims may be denied after prior authorization has been granted. This bill seeks to enhance transparency and accountability in the dental insurance process, particularly in relation to provider notifications and the handling of contract assignments between dental carriers and providers.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding HB4789 appears to be positive among healthcare providers. The legislation is seen as a necessary reform to address long-standing issues with dental claim denials and authorizations that providers face when dealing with insurance entities. However, while there is broad support from dental professionals, concerns may arise from insurance companies that might view the changes as an increased administrative burden.

Contention

One of the notable points of contention regarding HB4789 is the balance between protecting providers and ensuring that insurance companies can manage their networks effectively. There are concerns that while the bill promotes fairness, it might also introduce complications for dental carriers regarding compliance and administrative operations. Opponents may argue that these requirements could lead to inefficiencies in processing claims and managing provider networks, sparking a debate on the best practices for governing the dental insurance landscape.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2249

Public contracts: local agencies: alternative procedure.

CA SB1422

Acquisition of goods and services: alternative contracting procedures: installation of carpet, resilient flooring, synthetic turf, and lighting fixtures: pilot.

CA AB1424

University of California: Best Value Construction Contracting Program.

CA AB792

Department of Technology: negotiation process: report.

CA AB1694

Foster care payments: income.

CA AB767

Victim compensation: use of excessive force by a peace officer.

CA SB1505

State contracts: procurement processes.

CA AB639

Department of General Services: contracts: electronic submission