Illinois Senate Bill SB1967

Illinois 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/9/23
• Refer: 2/9/23
• Refer: 2/21/23
• Refer: 3/10/23

Caption

FIREARMS RESTRAINING ORDER

Impact

Should SB1967 be enacted, it would establish the Office of Firearms Restraining Order Coordination within the Department of Human Services, outlining a formalized structure for managing firearms restraining orders. This office would play a crucial role in liaising between petitioners, state attorneys, and the courts, enhancing the effectiveness and efficiency of how these orders are processed and enforced. Additionally, the bill clarifies protocols for the surrender of Firearm Owner's Identification Cards, which would remain in effect for the duration of any protective order. Such measures aim to improve public safety by restricting access to firearms for individuals identified as a threat.

Summary

SB1967 is a significant legislative proposal in the state of Illinois that aims to amend existing laws within the Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities Code, specifically focusing on the procedures surrounding firearms restraining orders. The bill mandates that when a qualified examiner determines an individual poses a clear and present danger to themselves or others, they are required to notify relevant authorities, including the Department of Human Services and law enforcement agencies within 24 hours. This stipulation seeks to ensure that there are immediate responses in cases of potential threats arising from individuals with mental health concerns.

Contention

Debate surrounding SB1967 is likely to involve discussions about the balance between public safety and individual rights, particularly in relation to mental health. Opponents may argue that the bill places too many restrictions on individuals based on determinations that could be subjective or may raise concerns over due process. Proponents, however, assert that this legislation is a vital step in addressing gun violence in the state by increasing oversight on firearm access among individuals deemed a risk due to mental health issues. The effectiveness of the proposed measures remains a focal point of contention as the bill progresses through the legislative process.