Illinois House Bill HB1929

Illinois 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/29/25
• Refer: 2/4/25
• Refer: 2/25/25
• Report Pass: 3/19/25
• Refer: 4/11/25

Caption

HUMAN RIGHTS-PRIOR CONVICTION

Impact

If passed, HB1929 would create significant impacts on the legal landscape regarding the treatment of formerly convicted individuals in Illinois. This could lead to more equitable opportunities in employment and housing, as protected class status would mean that discrimination against these individuals would be recognized and actionable under the law. Additionally, the Department of Human Rights would be tasked with developing rules to establish guidelines concerning the eligibility criteria and the process by which protected class status can be granted or revoked.

Summary

House Bill 1929 amends the Illinois Human Rights Act to establish a framework allowing formerly convicted individuals to petition for protected class status. This status could assist in mitigating the discrimination that those individuals may face in employment and housing due to their past convictions. The bill stipulates specific eligibility criteria that must be met by the petitioners, such as complying with parole conditions, obtaining a high school diploma or equivalent, and not having any felony or misdemeanor convictions in the past five years. The bill aims to facilitate the reintegration of formerly convicted persons into society, providing them with necessary protections under human rights law.

Contention

The implementation of HB1929 raises important discussions surrounding the balance between public safety and rehabilitation. Proponents argue that granting protected class status promotes social reintegration and reduces recidivism rates. They suggest that the bill recognizes the challenges faced by those seeking to rebuild their lives after incarceration. Conversely, some critics may express concerns about potential loopholes or the implications of granting such status on existing laws related to employment and public safety. The criteria for revoking protected class status after subsequent convictions also introduce a nuanced aspect to the debate, potentially impacting the bill's acceptance among different legislative stakeholders.