Kansas House Bill HB2130

Kansas 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/28/25
• Refer: 1/28/25

Caption

Authorizing retirement and disability benefits under KPERS, KP&F and the retirement system for judges to be paid on either a biweekly or monthly basis at the option of a member or recipient.

Impact

The implications of HB 2130 are significant for state laws governing retirement and pension systems. Specifically, sections of K.S.A. 20-2609, 20-2610, 74-4915, and 74-4962 will be amended to incorporate these new payment options. The bill repeals previous provisions that mandated monthly-only distributions, thereby aligning with contemporary practices that offer more diverse financial options for civil service employees. This adjustment not only modernizes the state's retirement systems but also reflects an understanding of the variety of financial situations that retirees may face.

Summary

House Bill 2130 seeks to amend the existing regulations concerning the Kansas Public Employees Retirement System (KPERS) and the retirement system for judges by allowing retirement and disability benefits to be paid on either a biweekly or monthly basis at the election of the member or recipient. This change aims to provide more flexibility to state employees and judges when it comes to receiving their retirement benefits, responding to evolving needs of beneficiaries regarding their payment preferences. By authorizing the option for biweekly payments, the bill recognizes that members may prefer a more frequent disbursement of their benefits for budgeting purposes.

Contention

While many stakeholders support the proposed flexibility, there may be concerns regarding the administrative costs and changes required to implement such alterations throughout the state's pension systems. There is a possibility that some representatives may fear that frequent payments could lead to budgeting challenges within the state retirement funds. As legislators deliberate this bill, considerations will also need to include how it aligns with state fiscal policies and whether any contingencies are needed to safeguard the funds against potential mismanagement or shortfalls.