Kansas House Bill HB2280

Kansas 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/5/25
• Refer: 2/5/25
• Report Pass: 2/11/25
• Engrossed: 2/19/25
• Refer: 2/20/25
• Report Pass: 3/13/25
• Enrolled: 4/10/25
• Passed: 4/10/25

Caption

Adding a citation to the code of federal regulations to the definition of veteran and disabled veteran and removing the active requirement from military service members for occupational licensure.

Impact

The bill's provisions are expected to significantly impact state laws regarding the licensure of veterans and servicemembers. By aligning definitions with federal standards and eliminating the active requirement, the bill opens doors for many military personnel to obtain licenses more readily, potentially filling gaps in various professional fields that face personnel shortages. It may also serve to honor and support the contributions of veterans by enhancing their employability and integration into civilian life.

Summary

House Bill 2280 aims to modify the definition of 'veteran' and 'disabled veteran,' aligning state law with federal regulations by incorporating specific citations from the Code of Federal Regulations. Additionally, it seeks to remove the active-duty service requirement for military servicemembers when applying for occupational licensure in Kansas. This change is intended to streamline the licensure process for those who have served in the armed forces, making it easier for veterans and military personnel to enter the workforce in Kansas.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around HB 2280 has been supportive among veteran advocacy groups and those concerned with the integration of military personnel into the state's workforce. Proponents argue that the bill recognizes the sacrifices of servicemembers and provides them with the necessary tools to succeed in civilian occupations. However, some concerns have been raised about the potential implications of altering licensing requirements, suggesting that the bill should ensure rigorous standards are maintained for public safety.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the balance between facilitating access to occupational licensure for veterans and ensuring that public safety is not compromised by relaxing requirements. Critics may express the need for caution, arguing that licensure standards should still reflect adequate training and qualifications. Moreover, discussions might also center on the implications of such changes on current professionals and how they might affect the job market within specific sectors.