Kansas House Bill HB2388

Kansas 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/9/23
• Refer: 2/9/23
• Report Pass: 2/21/23
• Refer: 2/22/23
• Refer: 3/1/23
• Report Pass: 3/7/23
• Engrossed: 3/20/23
• Refer: 3/21/23
• Failed: 4/30/24

Caption

Requiring that licensing bodies provide paper-based and verified electronic credentials to credential holders, including military servicemembers and others receiving Kansas credentials based on their credentials from other jurisdictions, that the secretary of administration develop and implement an electronic license verification system, that centralized electronic credential data management systems be established with instant verification systems operated by licensing bodies and excepting the certification of law enforcement officers from all provisions of the amended section.

Impact

The bill introduces significant changes to how occupational licensing operates in Kansas. By requiring licensing bodies to implement centralized electronic credential data management systems, it ensures that credentials can be verified instantly. This move is anticipated to reduce the time and complexity involved in verifying qualifications, enabling a faster transition for professionals into the Kansas workforce. The implementation of these measures is particularly beneficial for those with military backgrounds, as it provides a more seamless path to employment upon relocation.

Summary

House Bill 2388 focuses on improving the process of occupational licensing in Kansas. It mandates that licensing bodies not only provide paper-based credentials but also verified electronic credentials to all applicants. The bill aims to streamline the licensing process for individuals, particularly military servicemembers and their spouses, who often face barriers when transferring their professional licenses from one state to another. It acknowledges the challenges associated with the transferability of licenses and emphasizes the importance of accessibility and efficiency in the application process.

Contention

There may be points of contention regarding the sufficiency of the amendment to existing laws. Some stakeholders might express concerns about how the new electronic systems will be integrated with current processes and whether they will adequately address issues of security and privacy. Additionally, while the expedited process for military families is a positive step, its broader implications for all applicants could lead to discussions about the standardization of requirements and potential disparities in treatment between applicants based on their background.