Kansas House Bill HB2381

Kansas 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/13/25
• Refer: 2/13/25
• Refer: 2/27/25

Caption

Establishing the safe and secure firearm detection program in the office of the attorney general, providing for certain entities to use firearm detection software, establishing the safe and secure firearm detection fund and transferring funds from the state general fund to support the program.

Impact

The bill introduces specific requirements for the firearm detection software to be used in public settings. The software must integrate with existing security camera systems and operate from a control center staffed by qualified personnel who can communicate threats in real time. This is poised to improve the security infrastructure of educational institutions and other public areas, potentially contributing to a decrease in firearm-related incidents in these settings. The establishment of the safe and secure firearm detection fund will also ensure that resources are available for maintaining and expanding the program.

Summary

House Bill 2381 establishes a safe and secure firearm detection program under the oversight of the Attorney General in Kansas. The legislation mandates the creation of a program that allows public entities and accredited nonpublic schools to implement firearm detection software designed to identify unholstered firearms. This program aims to enhance safety in schools and public spaces by proactively detecting potential threats before they escalate. The bill also provides for a fundamental funding mechanism by allocating $20 million from the state general fund to support the program's implementation.

Contention

While the intent of HB 2381 is to enhance public safety, there could be debates regarding the efficacy and ethical implications of deploying such surveillance technology. Critics may express concerns about privacy and the potential for misuse of surveillance data. There could also be discussions around the financial implications of state funding, particularly in comparison to other educational priorities. Community stakeholders may voice differing opinions on whether the focus should remain on technological solutions rather than broader approaches to safety, such as mental health support and conflict resolution programs.