Kentucky House Bill HJR61

Kentucky 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/21/23
• Refer: 2/21/23

Caption

A JOINT RESOLUTION applying for an Article V convention to propose amendments to the Constitution of the United States that limit the terms of office for federal government officials and members of Congress.

Impact

If passed, HJR61 would not directly change state laws but would initiate a process that could lead to significant changes at the federal level. By applying for a convention under Article V of the Constitution, the resolution seeks to engage the legislative efforts of other states in a broader push for constitutional amendments aimed specifically at term limits for members of Congress and other federal officials. This could alter the dynamics of federal governance by potentially reducing the tenure of incumbents and encouraging political turnover.

Summary

HJR61 is a joint resolution proposed in the Commonwealth of Kentucky that applies for an Article V convention aimed at limiting the terms of office for federal government officials and members of Congress. The resolution is positioned as a response to perceived overreach by the federal government, particularly in areas relating to spending and mandates. Proponents of the resolution believe that establishing term limits is a crucial step toward curbing the influence and power of long-serving federal officials, thus fostering a more accountable government structure.

Sentiment

The sentiments expressed around HJR61 are mixed, with strong support from those who advocate for accountability and reform in federal governance. Supporters argue that limiting terms can lead to fresher perspectives and reduce potential corruption or disconnect from constituents. Conversely, some critics argue that such measures may undermine experienced leadership and the effectiveness of elected officials, suggesting a need for caution in pursuing such amendments.

Contention

Key points of contention surrounding HJR61 include the implications of convening a convention of states, which some legal experts warn could result in unpredictable outcomes regarding the Constitution. Critics are concerned that the process may open doors to other amendments that could stray from the original intent, leading to far-reaching changes beyond just term limits. Discussions among legislators and advocacy groups highlight these concerns, underscoring the importance of careful deliberation in addressing such a significant constitutional approach.