Louisiana House Bill HB128

Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/29/10
• Refer: 3/29/10

Caption

Appropriates funds for payment of judgment against DOTD in the suit entitled "Dannie Conner and Gilbert Rollins, et al v. Jefferson Parish Sheriff's Office, et al"

Impact

By appropriating these funds, HB 128 demonstrates the state's commitment to upholding legal decisions and fulfilling financial judgments associated with its departments. Such appropriations are a common practice to ensure that the state can manage its liabilities while maintaining the integrity of its judicial commitments. The bill reflects the need for transparency and accountability within government funding, particularly in cases where state agencies are held liable for certain actions.

Summary

House Bill 128 is a legislative proposal that appropriates funds from the state general fund for the 2010-2011 fiscal year in order to cover a consent judgment against the Department of Transportation and Development (DOTD). The financial allocation totals $3,928.63, intended to satisfy legal obligations stemming from the case 'Dannie Conner and Gilbert Rollins v. Jefferson Parish Sheriff's Office et al', which has been docketed in the Civil District Court for Orleans Parish. This act is designed to ensure that the state's financial responsibilities regarding court judgments are met in a timely manner.

Sentiment

There seems to be a neutral sentiment surrounding HB 128, as it addresses a necessary legal obligation without deeply controversial intentions or content. Given that the bill is primarily a fiscal measure to settle a court judgment, it is less likely to provoke partisan debate or strong public reactions compared to more polarizing legislation. The pragmatic nature of the bill aligns with the broader duty of government to address its financial responsibilities.

Contention

While HB 128 is not expected to ignite significant contention, it does highlight the ongoing financial pressures on state budgets when settling judgments against state agencies. Some potential discussions could revolve around the adequacy of funding allocated to the DOTD in light of similar future liabilities. Although the current amount seems modest, stakeholders may raise questions regarding how such settlements are funded and whether state funds are being managed effectively, especially in times of budget constraints.