Louisiana House Bill HB1282

Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/13/10
• Refer: 4/14/10

Caption

Appropriates funds for payment of judgment in the suit entitled "James D. Smith v. State of Louisiana, et al"

Impact

The passage of HB 1282 would ensure that the state meets its legal financial responsibilities as determined by the court. This act reinforces the importance of judicial outcomes in state governance, as failing to appropriate funds for such judgments could lead to further legal complications and might undermine public trust in state institutions. By fulfilling this financial obligation, the state demonstrates adherence to the rule of law and responsibility in managing taxpayer funds.

Summary

House Bill 1282 relates to appropriations for the payment of a consent judgment stemming from the lawsuit 'James D. Smith v. State of Louisiana, et al'. The bill authorizes the allocation of $45,000 from the General Fund of the State of Louisiana for the fiscal year 2010-2011. This funding is specifically designated for satisfying the court's decision in the referenced case, which highlights the state's obligation to uphold judicial decisions and handle settlements appropriately.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 1282 is largely uncontroversial, centering primarily on the necessity of fulfilling legal obligations rather than on contentious policy debates. Generally, legislators understand the importance of ensuring that consent judgments are paid in a timely manner, thus avoiding negative implications for the state's legal standing and fiscal management.

Contention

While the bill itself does not seem to be a point of significant contention, discussions surrounding financial appropriations and the management of state funds can sometimes inspire debate regarding prioritization in budget allocations and accountability in state expenditures. However, given the specific nature of the appropriations, there is no notable opposition to the bill itself.