Louisiana House Bill HB302

Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/29/10
• Refer: 3/29/10
• Report Pass: 4/20/10
• Engrossed: 4/27/10
• Report Pass: 6/9/10
• Enrolled: 6/21/10
• Chaptered: 6/30/10
• Passed: 6/30/10

Caption

Provides relative to disclosure of information concerning certain boards and commissions (EN NO IMPACT See Note)

Impact

The enactment of HB 302 will significantly impact the governance of boards and commissions by instituting a clear framework for accountability. By making the names and business interests of board members accessible to the public, the bill promotes trust in government operations. The information will be published on a designated website, which enhances public oversight and provides citizens with the means to evaluate the decisions made by these boards based on the disclosed interests of their members.

Summary

House Bill 302 seeks to improve transparency and accountability within boards and commissions in Louisiana by establishing strict disclosure requirements for their members. The bill mandates that members appointed by the governor must disclose their business or professional clients before Senate confirmation, as well as any relationships established during their term. This ongoing disclosure is aimed at preventing conflicts of interest and ensuring that the public is informed about the professional affiliations of those making decisions on behalf of the state.

Sentiment

General sentiment surrounding HB 302 appears supportive, as it addresses long-standing concerns about transparency in public entities. Advocates argue that increased disclosure is a necessary step to combat any potential corruption and ensure that board members serve the public interest. However, there may also be concerns regarding the potential burden this places on board members and the implications for their privacy and professional relationships.

Contention

While the bill is largely received positively, some points of contention may arise regarding the practicality and scope of the disclosure requirements. Critics could argue that the mandatory reporting of business relationships may deter qualified individuals from serving on boards, particularly those from professions that rely on a network of client relationships. Additionally, the effectiveness of the law in curbing unethical behavior will depend on the enforcement mechanisms established to hold board members accountable for failing to comply with the disclosure requirements.