Provides relative to a constitutional convention (OR INCREASE GF EX See Note)
If passed, HB 567 would significantly overhaul Louisiana's current constitution, which has been amended many times since its initial adoption in 1974. Proponents argue that a new constitution is necessary to simplify and modernize state governance, addressing critical issues like fiscal constraints on local governments and enabling more flexible legislative solutions. The bill emphasizes the need for a constitution that supports effective governance and represents the needs of its citizens, while also integrating significant policy areas that require constitutional attention.
House Bill 567 calls for a constitutional convention in Louisiana aimed at framing a new constitution for the state. The bill outlines the establishment of an Evaluation and Drafting Committee that will assess the need for the convention and create a structured plan for its execution. This includes the formation of necessary committees, establishment of a budget, and setting timelines for the completion of the new draft. The convention is set to convene on January 16, 2012, and will feature 123 delegates, primarily elected from legislative districts, alongside appointed representatives from various organizations.
Overall, discussions around HB 567 indicate a mixed sentiment. Supporters express enthusiasm for the possibilities of reforming state governance and constraints currently imposed by the existing constitution. In contrast, some legislators and community members raise concerns regarding potential power shifts resulting from the new constitution, fearing it may prioritize certain interests over more diverse local needs. This polarized sentiment reflects broader debates on the balance between state control and local governance autonomy.
Debate surrounding HB 567 highlights a key contention point: the authority and composition of the newly formed constitutional convention. Critics worry that the manner of delegate selection and the committee's potential influence could lead to outcomes that do not represent the broad spectrum of Louisiana's population. The bill explicitly prohibits alterations to certain established structures, including maintaining the state capital in Baton Rouge and preserving existing public office terms, indicating an awareness of the contentious nature of revising foundational legal frameworks.