Provides for an in-depth study of the need for and for a plan for the conduct of a constitutional convention, creates a committee for such purpose, and expresses legislative intent to call a convention based upon the results of such study
If enacted, HCR179 would initiate a thorough examination of Louisiana's constitution and potentially lead to extensive legislative changes. The committee would be empowered to analyze key policy issues and draft a proposed new constitution by June 27, 2014. This could facilitate a more dynamic legislative process, enabling the government to respond better to contemporary issues. It is anticipated that the work of the committee and the convention could lead to significant alterations in how Louisiana's governmental framework operates, impacting various aspects of governance and citizen engagement.
HCR179 is a proposed concurrent resolution that aims to establish an Evaluation and Drafting Committee to assess whether a constitutional convention is necessary for Louisiana. The bill is driven by the recognition of potential limitations within the current state constitution, which was adopted over three decades ago and has undergone numerous amendments. Proponents argue that a constitutional overhaul could address critical policy areas affecting state governance, such as tax structure, budgetary practices, and local government authority. The proposal also expresses an intent to convene the convention on September 3, 2013, should the committee recommend it.
The sentiment surrounding HCR179 is mixed, reflecting a balance between the need for constitutional reform and concerns over the implications of such changes. Supporters emphasize the need for modernization and flexibility in state governance, viewing the proposed committee as a positive step towards addressing systemic issues. Conversely, opponents may worry about the risks associated with overhauling the constitution, including potential loss of protections embedded in the existing framework. The upcoming discussions will likely showcase diverse perspectives on constitutional integrity and the importance of local governance.
Notable points of contention regarding HCR179 include debates over the selection of convention delegates and concerns about the scope of the committee's authority. Critics may argue that concentrated power within a constitutional convention could lead to unfavorable outcomes for specific demographics or local governments. Additionally, provisions requiring a majority vote for the adoption of the new constitution and alternative proposals are crucial aspects that merit thorough discussion, as they underline the democratic processes that will govern any proposed changes.