Provides for an in-depth study of the need for a plan for the conduct of a constitutional convention, creates a committee for such purpose, and expresses legislative intent to call a convention based upon the results of such study
The bill aims to address various key policy issues that are believed to be hampering the state's legislative effectiveness, especially in areas such as taxation, budgetary practices, and local governance. By potentially reshaping the constitution, proponents argue that it will allow for enhanced legislative flexibility and better alignment with the contemporary needs of Louisiana residents. Importantly, the proposed convention would consist of 123 delegates, a mix of elected and appointed individuals, representing diverse interests and expertise, reflecting a more collaborative approach to constitutional reform.
HCR24, introduced by Representative Abramson, proposes the establishment of an Evaluation and Drafting Committee tasked with determining the necessity of a constitutional convention for Louisiana. The bill expresses a legislative intent to convene such a convention on September 5, 2017, should the committee find it necessary. The convention's primary responsibility would be to draft a new state constitution, which should be completed by June 27, 2018, and subsequently submitted to voters for approval. The impetus behind the bill arises from the need for comprehensive changes to the current constitution, which has seen numerous amendments since its adoption in 1974.
The sentiment surrounding HCR24 appears to be cautiously optimistic among its supporters, who view the bill as a necessary step towards modernizing the state’s governance framework. However, there are underlying concerns regarding the process and scope of changes that a constitutional convention might entail. Opponents express apprehension that such a convention could lead to unanticipated repercussions, particularly regarding existing rights and government structures, emphasizing the importance of careful deliberation and transparency throughout the process.
Notable points of contention include the method of selecting delegates and the potential limitations placed on the convention's scope by the legislative call. Critics worry that the appointment of delegates from specific organizations may skew representation, while supporters argue that it ensures diverse perspectives are included in the drafting process. Additionally, the bill explicitly prohibits any changes to the 'Declaration of Rights' and the potential relocation of the state capital, areas that could be highly contentious during the convention.