Directs DEQ and DOTD to study the feasibility of using compressed natural gas buses
Impact
If implemented, HCR184 could have significant implications for state transportation policies by potentially integrating CNG into mass transit systems, reducing dependency on diesel and gasoline. The study mandated by the bill could pave the way for future legislation that promotes alternative fuel usage in public transit, thereby improving air quality and reducing greenhouse gas emissions in the state. Additionally, the outcomes could affect budgetary decisions regarding infrastructure and transit funding, as CNG vehicles have been noted for their lower maintenance costs compared to traditional fuel vehicles.
Summary
HCR184 directs the Department of Environmental Quality and the Department of Transportation and Development to study the feasibility of utilizing buses that are powered by compressed natural gas (CNG) for mass transit applications. The resolution highlights the importance of CNG as a reliable and clean alternative fuel source amid the United States' reliance on imported petroleum. Through this initiative, the bill emphasizes the potential environmental benefits and cost-effectiveness of transitioning to CNG-powered buses, which are currently being employed successfully across the country for various fleet operations.
Sentiment
Overall, the sentiment around HCR184 appears to be positive, particularly among advocates of environmental sustainability and alternative energy sources. Supporters believe that the transition to CNG can bolster state efforts to reduce carbon emissions and potentially lead to financial savings in public transport operations. However, the discussion may also attract concerns from stakeholders who have interests aligned with traditional fuel sources, highlighting a tension between innovative energy solutions and legacy industries.
Contention
Notably, while the bill calls for a study rather than mandating immediate changes, it raises questions about the state's readiness to embrace CNG technology fully. There may be contention surrounding the initial investment required for infrastructure to support CNG, such as refueling stations and compatible vehicles, which could be significant. Furthermore, the results of the feasibility study will likely influence debates over the prioritization of funding for alternative fuels versus existing transportation needs, showcasing ongoing conflicts in energy policy and environmental regulation.
Memorialize the United States Congress to support expansion and use of domestic natural gas and alternative energies, and urge agencies to operate vehicles using compressed natural gas.
Provides for equivalency of the special fuels tax with the gasoline tax on motor vehicles that operate on the highways using liquefied natural gas, liquefied petroleum gas, or compressed natural gas. (7/1/15) (EN +$6,000,000 SD RV See Note)
Relating to the repeal of the motor fuel taxes on compressed natural gas and liquefied natural gas and the exemption from sales and use taxes of natural gas used as a motor fuel.