Louisiana House Bill HCR212

Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

• Introduced: 6/2/10
• Engrossed: 6/2/10
• Passed: 6/4/10

Caption

Requests the Board of Regents, Dept. of Revenue, and La. Workforce Commission to work cooperatively relative to the reporting and sharing of certain data

Impact

HCR212 aims to improve educational outcomes and alignment with workforce requirements in Louisiana. By facilitating the cooperation of these agencies, the resolution seeks to address concerns about the preparedness of graduates for the job market. It indicates a significant move towards enhanced transparency and accountability in higher education, which is critical for fostering a skilled workforce that meets the demands of local industries.

Summary

House Concurrent Resolution No. 212 (HCR212) urges cooperation among key state agencies, specifically the Board of Regents, the Department of Revenue, and the Louisiana Workforce Commission. The resolution focuses on the importance of sharing data regarding the success of postsecondary graduates entering the workforce. It emphasizes the need for comprehensive oversight and collaborative efforts to enhance educational effectiveness, ensuring that graduates possess the necessary skills and knowledge for successful employment.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HCR212 is primarily positive, reflecting a shared recognition of the necessity for data-driven decision-making in education and workforce development. Supporters believe that this initiative will lead to beneficial collaborations that enhance the quality of education and, subsequently, improve employment rates among graduates. However, as it emphasizes reporting and collaboration among agencies, there may be concerns about resource allocations and the administrative burden of tracking such data.

Contention

While HCR212 is largely supported, some contention may arise regarding the implementation of the proposed data-sharing agreement. Concerns might include privacy issues related to student data, the effectiveness of inter-agency cooperation, and the potential for bureaucratic delays. Critics may argue that without clear directives and actionable plans, the resolution could serve more as a gesture than a substantive change in policy, potentially limiting its effectiveness.