Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HCSR9

Caption

Requests the House and Senate governmental affairs committees to study the composition of the membership of boards and commissions

Impact

The passage of HCSR9 would lead to a focused examination of the current membership structures of boards and commissions, potentially leading to recommendations that facilitate a more equitable representation within these bodies. The findings from this study are anticipated to inform future legislative actions and appointments, aiming to rectify any disparities that currently exist between the demographic makeup of these influential groups and the populace they serve. By emphasizing the necessity for diversity, the study could influence state policy regarding governance and representation.

Summary

House Concurrent Study Request No. 9 (HCSR9) requests the House and Senate governmental affairs committees to conduct a study on the composition of the membership of various boards and commissions in Louisiana. The bill highlights the importance of these entities in serving the citizens of the state and seeks to ensure that their membership accurately reflects the diverse demographics of Louisiana's population. This encompasses considerations of gender, race, and geography as stipulated in the existing law R.S. 42:2.1, which mandates attention to demographic representation during appointments.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HCSR9 is generally positive, with a common recognition of the need for diverse representation in state governance. Legislators and community advocates alike appear to appreciate the intent behind the bill, understanding that a varied composition can better reflect the interests and concerns of all citizens in the decision-making processes. However, some may express skepticism regarding the effectiveness of studies and recommendations in bringing about actual change, highlighting the importance of actions that follow the findings.

Contention

While there may not be explicit widespread contention around HCSR9, underlying concerns about the actual implementation of recommendations post-study could arise. Questions may linger about whether the findings will be taken seriously by those in power and whether there will be sufficient political will to enact necessary changes based on the study's conclusions. The bill opens the dialogue about representation but leaves open the challenges regarding practical applications and realignment of current membership structures.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

MI HB4870

Campaign finance: contributions and expenditures; funds donated to a candidate for recall efforts; require candidate to establish a separate account used for recall purposes. Amends secs. 3, 11, 12, 21, 24 & 52 of 1976 PA 388 (MCL 169.203 et seq.) & adds sec. 21b.

MI HB4326

Campaign finance: contributions and expenditures; provision related to officeholders raising funds when facing a recall; modify, and require candidate to establish a separate account used for recall purposes. Amends secs. 3, 11, 12, 21, 24 & 52 of 1976 PA 388 (MCL 169.203 et seq.) & adds sec. 21b.

CA SB602

Advisory bodies.

CA SB1048

Advisory bodies.

CA AB3239

Advisory bodies.

KS HR6003

Providing temporary rules of the House of Representatives for the 2023 session until permanent rules are adopted.

MN HC1

A house concurrent resolution relating to the regent nomination joint committee.

AZ HB2443

Campaign finance; contributions limits