Provides for management, control, and maintenance of the New Orleans Lakefront Airport. (8/15/10)
The implementation of SB 772 will significantly alter the management structure of the New Orleans Lakefront Airport, allowing for direct oversight by a board composed of various appointed members representing different stakeholders, including state representatives and officials from the Orleans Levee District. This shift is aimed at fostering a more focused approach to airport management that aligns with regional transportation goals. Moreover, the authority will have the power to collect revenues generated from airport operations and allocate surplus funds to the Orleans Levee District.
Senate Bill 772, introduced by Senator Morrell, focuses on the creation and management of the New Orleans Lakefront Airport Authority, an entity which will oversee the operation and maintenance of the New Orleans Lakefront Airport. The bill provides a framework for establishing this authority as a political subdivision under the Department of Transportation and Development, transferring responsibilities from the state to a dedicated board of commissioners. The transition is intended to enhance governance and operational efficiency regarding the airport's functions.
Sentiment around SB 772 appears generally supportive within legislative discussions, with advocates highlighting the importance of local management in enhancing operational efficiencies and addressing specific needs pertinent to the New Orleans area. Supporters argue that this localized governance will lead to improved services and economic opportunities tied to the airport. However, there are concerns about the authority's long-term sustainability, particularly regarding how effectively it can fulfill its oversight responsibilities without jeopardizing existing contracts or obligations.
While the bill's proponents view the establishment of the New Orleans Lakefront Airport Authority as a positive step toward better management and growth of airport facilities, there may be contention regarding the allocation of financial resources and the scope of authority's powers. The potential for conflict over management decisions between the authority and other state agencies or existing contracts with service providers could raise local and regulatory challenges. Critics may also point to the risks of political influence affecting appointments and operations of the board of commissioners.