Louisiana Senate Bill SCR130

Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

• Introduced: 6/16/10

Caption

Request joint committee to study the horse racing industry and regulation thereof.

Impact

If adopted, this resolution could significantly impact the state's approach to regulating the horse racing industry. It emphasizes the importance of the industry to Louisiana's economy and calls for a thorough review of the current regulatory frameworks. The implications of the findings could lead to changes in the commission's operations or further legislative actions to enhance the oversight and management of horse racing within the state.

Summary

SCR130 is a Senate Concurrent Resolution that requests a joint committee composed of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Consumer Protection, and International Affairs and the House Committee on Commerce to study the regulation of the horse racing industry in Louisiana. The resolution aims to determine whether the Louisiana State Racing Commission is effectively regulating the horse racing industry to fulfill the legislative intent and policies established by Louisiana law. Furthermore, it seeks to evaluate whether the commission is employing best practices in its regulatory functions.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SCR130 appears to be supportive of scrutinizing existing regulations in the horse racing sector. Lawmakers recognize the industry's contribution to the economy and seem to endorse a careful examination to ensure regulatory practices align with legislative goals. However, the outcome could lead to tensions if changes are made that affect existing operators in the industry.

Contention

The notable points of contention around SCR130 may revolve around what regulatory changes, if any, should be implemented based on the committee's findings. Stakeholders in the horse racing industry might have differing views on whether current regulations adequately serve their interests. As the resolution does not specify the scope of the study or potential recommendations, there might be debates on the extent of necessary regulatory reforms.