Louisiana House Bill HB173

Louisiana 2011 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/25/11
• Refer: 4/25/11

Caption

Provides for the compensation of higher education system presidents and the heads of public colleges and universities

Impact

The passage of HB 173 would result in significant changes to how higher education leaders in Louisiana are compensated. The Board of Regents is charged with identifying peer institutions and their average salaries to ensure compliance with the new law. This oversight aims to prevent disproportionate salaries that might lead to public scrutiny and potential budgetary fallout. By limiting salaries and prohibiting additional allowances funded by state money, the bill seeks to promote transparency and accountability in higher education administration.

Summary

House Bill 173 is a legislative proposal aimed at regulating the compensation of system presidents and heads of public colleges and universities in Louisiana. The bill establishes a salary cap that is not to exceed 10% above the average salaries for comparable positions within other Southern Regional Education Board (SREB) states. This measure intends to align Louisiana's higher education pay structure more closely with regional trends and promote fiscal responsibility by requiring salary reductions for any public officials earning above this threshold. The bill uniquely excludes the Louisiana Community and Technical College System from these regulations, highlighting a focus on traditional, four-year institutions.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 173 seems to encompass both support and concerns. Proponents argue that the bill will bring much-needed fiscal discipline to higher education and address public concerns regarding wasteful spending on administrative salaries. Conversely, opponents express worry about restrictions that may dissuade qualified candidates from seeking leadership roles within the state's higher education system, thereby potentially impacting the quality of leadership in public colleges and universities.

Contention

Debate on HB 173 may arise chiefly from its provisions that limit the ability of these college and university heads to receive compensation beyond established caps. Critics worry this could hinder recruitment efforts, especially when competing with institutions in nearby states that may offer higher salaries. Furthermore, the prohibition of additional state-funded allowances raises concerns about the ability of these leaders to perform their roles effectively, especially in areas requiring travel or other business-related expenses.