Louisiana House Bill HB536

Louisiana 2011 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/25/11
• Refer: 4/25/11
• Report Pass: 5/3/11
• Engrossed: 5/10/11
• Report Pass: 6/6/11
• Enrolled: 6/22/11
• Chaptered: 7/1/11
• Passed: 7/1/11

Caption

Provides relative to equal access to governmental and public facilities for the disabled community

Impact

The passage of HB 536 is expected to have a significant impact on state laws concerning disability rights and building codes. It mandates that any alterations to public or governmental buildings must comply with updated ADA standards, thus promoting equal access. This involves substantial changes in how local governments and businesses structure their buildings and facilities, ensuring that those who are disabled can use them without hindrance. The bill emphasizes the state’s commitment to uphold the civil rights of individuals with disabilities, fostering an environment that supports their full participation in society.

Summary

House Bill 536 seeks to enhance accessibility for the disabled community within public and governmental facilities in Louisiana. The bill amends existing laws to include stricter compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) standards, ensuring that public buildings are fully accessible to individuals with disabilities. This initiative is a direct response to the challenges faced by the disabled community, aimed at removing architectural barriers that have traditionally limited their access to various facilities in society. Provisions include mandated parking spaces reserved for mobility-impaired individuals and maintenance of these designated areas according to ADA guidelines.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 536 has largely been positive, with strong support from advocacy groups representing disabled persons. Proponents argue that this bill is a necessary step towards inclusivity and equal rights for all citizens, regardless of physical abilities. The discussions also highlight a societal obligation to provide accessible environments for everyone. However, while most support the intent of the legislation, there are concerns regarding the implementation costs and the potential burden on local governments and small businesses in meeting these new requirements.

Contention

Key points of contention regarding HB 536 revolve around its implementation and the adequacy of resources to facilitate such extensive changes. Some critics worry about the financial implications for municipalities and local businesses tasked with retrofitting buildings to meet the new accessibility standards. Conversely, supporters maintain that the long-term societal benefits far outweigh the initial costs, as simplifying access for disabled individuals is an investment in community health and welfare. Discussions also reflect the ongoing tension between enforcing state mandates and allowing local jurisdictions to tailor solutions that fit their unique circumstances.