Louisiana 2011 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB601

Introduced
5/2/11  

Caption

Appropriates funds for payment of judgment in the matter of "Kevin R. Johnson, et al v. State of Louisiana DOTD, et al"

Impact

The passage of HB 601 signifies an important action within state laws regarding the appropriation of funds tied to court judgments. By providing a specified amount for a legal settlement, it reaffirms the necessity for state governance to face its responsibilities in legal matters that involve minors. This appropriated fund will directly affect the individuals involved in the case by dispersing amounts to different guardians, thereby aiming to mitigate the financial impact on their lives resulting from the judicial decision.

Summary

House Bill 601 appropriates a total of $150,000 from the state general fund for the fiscal year 2011-2012 to satisfy a consent judgment in the case of 'Kevin R. Johnson, et al v. Lafay Flournoy, et al'. This bill serves to allocate funds specifically aimed at compensating several guardians for minor children involved in a legal case, reflecting the state's commitment to uphold the financial obligations determined by the judicial system. The bill will become effective on July 1, 2011, pending approval and potential veto scenarios.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding the bill appears to focus on the necessity of funding for legal obligations rather than sparking contentious debate. Given the nature of the bill pertaining to reparation for guardians of minor children, it has the potential to garner general support due to its underlying humanitarian aspect. Funding judgments like these typically align with public interests centered on justice and accountability in the state’s legal system.

Contention

Although HB 601 is primarily a financial appropriations bill with a straightforward purpose, one area of potential contention could arise from the sources of funding within the state budget. Legislators may have varying opinions on diverting funds from the general fund for this specific purpose, especially if there are competing budgetary needs. However, the clear aim of fulfilling a judicial mandate might mitigate significant pushback, making it more likely to advance without much opposition.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.