Appropriates funds for payment of judgment against DOTD in the matter of "Nathan Griffin and Linda Griffin v. State of La."
Impact
By appropriating these funds, the bill helps to ensure that the state adheres to legal judgments and effectively manages its financial responsibilities. This can set a precedent for future cases where state departments may face similar legal challenges. The prompt payment of judgments is crucial in maintaining public trust in governmental agencies and ensuring that citizens see justice served without prolonged delays in compensation.
Summary
House Bill 289, proposed by Representative Hensgens, is designed to allocate funds from the state general fund for the fiscal year 2012-2013. The bill specifically appropriates a sum of $6,500 to fulfill a consent judgment against the Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development (DOTD) resulting from the case of 'Nathan Griffin and Linda Griffin v. State of Louisiana.' This action underscores the state's commitment to honor legal rulings and properly manage its financial obligations stemming from court judgments.
Sentiment
The general sentiment surrounding HB 289 appears to be pragmatic; legislators recognize the necessity of complying with court rulings. While there may not be significant contention or opposition expressed in relation to this specific bill, it reflects broader legislative themes of accountability and responsible fiscal management. The commitment to fund legal judgments can be seen positively within the context of governance and trustworthiness of state agencies.
Contention
Though there is minimal indication of considerable dispute or opposition regarding HB 289, the bill does highlight an important aspect of legislative priorities—facilitating the payment of court orders. This becomes particularly relevant in discussions about the operational capacity and financial health of state agencies like the DOTD, which can influence policy decisions and budget allocations in the state. It's important, however, to maintain awareness of the implications of state financial commitments during times of fiscal constraints.
Appropriates funds for payment of judgment in the matter of "Larry F. Mitchell v. State of Louisiana DOTD, et al" consolidated with "Louise Griffin v. State of Louisiana, through the DOTD"
Appropriates funds for payment of judgments in the matters of "James Ronald Fowler, Jr. v. State of Louisiana DOTD" and "Crystal Williams v. State of Louisiana DOTD"
Appropriates funds for payment of judgment against the state in the matter of "Mardel Von Solow, et al, and Paul Williams Marks and Belinda Boutte Migues, et al v. DOTD"