Louisiana House Bill HB680

Louisiana 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/12/12
• Refer: 3/12/12
• Report Pass: 3/27/12
• Engrossed: 4/3/12
• Report Pass: 5/7/12
• Enrolled: 5/22/12
• Chaptered: 5/31/12
• Passed: 5/31/12

Caption

Provides relative to topographical mapping (EN SEE FISC NOTE SD EX See Note)

Impact

Should this bill be fully implemented, it will significantly impact how topographic information is collected and utilized within the state. Establishing a centralized digital geospatial database will facilitate improved data sharing among state agencies, potentially streamlining processes related to land use planning, infrastructure development, and environmental management. Additionally, this initiative aims to enhance the state's ability to respond to geographic information needs, ultimately supporting better informed decision-making across various sectors.

Summary

House Bill 680 aims to enhance Louisiana's geospatial capabilities by mandating the development and maintenance of a statewide digital geospatial database specifically for topographic mapping. The bill emphasizes the importance of geographic data for various applications, providing a structured approach to managing and collecting topographical information. The legislation empowers the relevant department to set standards, act as an authority on geographic names, and formulate necessary rules for effective data management. The goal is to create a reliable and accessible resource for public use and state agencies alike.

Sentiment

There appears to be a positive sentiment surrounding HB 680, especially among legislators who view it as a step forward in utilizing technology for effective governance. The unanimous support reflected in the voting history—passing with a 96-0 vote in the House—indicates a strong consensus among lawmakers on the necessity for updated geospatial capabilities. Stakeholders likely recognize the benefits of centralized and organized geographic data, suggesting an overall optimistic outlook on the bill's implementation.

Contention

While HB 680 received broad support, concerns about the funding and resources required for the ongoing development and maintenance of the digital geospatial database remain a potential point of contention. Questions regarding the project’s feasibility, long-term sustainability, and alignment with existing frameworks for data governance are crucial discussions that might arise as the plan is executed. Moreover, ensuring that stakeholders are involved in the management of the database will be essential in addressing any apprehensions regarding local control and data accuracy.