Louisiana House Bill HB723

Louisiana 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/12/12
• Refer: 3/12/12
• Report Pass: 5/14/12
• Engrossed: 5/21/12

Caption

Provides for authorized positions in the executive budget and appropriations bills (EG NO IMPACT GF EX See Note)

Impact

The modifications introduced by HB 723 are significant for state budgeting as they establish a comprehensive reporting structure that includes authorized positions and authorized other charges positions. This aligns with the state's effort to enhance budgetary accountability and performance-based management. By ensuring that personnel tables incorporate both categories, the legislation aims to clearly present financial requirements associated with staffing in the budget documents, which can lead to better oversight by the legislature.

Summary

House Bill 723 aims to amend the definitions related to authorized positions in appropriation bills and the executive budget within the state of Louisiana. The proposed law expands the existing framework to include a new definition for 'authorized other charges positions,' which pertains to roles funded by other charges categories in the state's accounting system. This bill is intended to provide clearer guidelines and ensure that the budgeting processes are thorough and transparent, reflecting all positions necessary for government operations.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding HB 723 appears to be positive, especially among proponents who argue that the bill enhances public finance transparency and accountability. It is viewed as a necessary step in refining the budgeting process for state operations. However, the discussions do hint at some ambivalence regarding the implementation process and potential bureaucratic implications, though no significant opposition was noted during the voting process.

Contention

While there are no major points of contention reported for HB 723, discussions highlighted concerns about the adjustments in personnel definitions and budgeting practices. These adjustments could lead to more stringent controls over state positions and resources, raising the question of how these changes might affect operational flexibility in state departments. However, the final vote indicated strong legislative support, suggesting that the benefits of the proposed changes were seen as outweighing any misgivings.