Louisiana House Bill HB805

Louisiana 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/12/12
• Refer: 3/12/12
• Report Pass: 4/3/12
• Engrossed: 4/16/12
• Refer: 4/17/12
• Report Pass: 5/14/12
• Enrolled: 6/3/12
• Chaptered: 6/13/12
• Passed: 6/13/12

Caption

Provides with respect to the regulation of motor carriers

Impact

The proposed amendments are intended to modernize and clarify the regulatory framework surrounding the operation of motor carriers in Louisiana. By establishing clearer definitions and requirements, HB 805 seeks to enhance the consistency and efficiency of transportation services. The bill removes the necessity for certain carriers to prove public convenience and necessity when obtaining permits, thereby reducing barriers to entry for service providers. This could potentially improve service availability and competition within the sector, although it may also require careful oversight to ensure service quality and public safety.

Summary

House Bill 805 aims to amend and reenact several provisions related to the regulation of motor carriers within Louisiana. The bill introduces definitions for terms such as 'certificate' for public convenience and necessity, and 'passenger carrying vehicle.' It stipulates that passenger carrying vehicles must have public liability and property damage insurance, which is a mandatory requirement. The bill also facilitates certain exemptions from registration, notably for vehicles operated by Medicare and Medicaid providers, indicating a focus on streamlining regulatory processes for specific types of transport service providers.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 805 seems to be generally supportive, particularly from the perspective of those involved in the transportation industry. Proponents argue that the bill simplistically aligns statewide regulations and facilitates easier compliance and operation for motor carriers. However, there are concerns from regulatory bodies regarding maintaining sufficient oversight as fewer hurdles are placed on carriers, highlighting the need for a balance between easing regulations and ensuring public safety and service reliability.

Contention

One notable point of contention in the discussions around HB 805 might revolve around the exemptions provided for certain types of vehicles, specifically those associated with medical services. Critics may argue that this could lead to a dilution of safety standards if less rigorous oversight is applied to these providers. Additionally, local jurisdictions may express concerns over the reduced ability to enforce local regulations, which could impact the ability to address specific community needs effectively.