Louisiana House Bill HB333

Louisiana 2013 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/8/13
• Refer: 4/8/13

Caption

Repeals the corporation franchise tax and provisions relative to determining "taxable capital" for purposes of levying the tax (OR -$79,000,000 GF RV See Note)

Summary

House Bill 333 is a legislative proposal aimed at repealing the corporation franchise tax as well as provisions related to determining 'taxable capital' under the existing Louisiana tax law. The bill proposes to remove all references and requirements associated with this tax, which presently impacts all domestic and certain foreign corporations operating within the state. The initiative reflects a significant shift in Louisiana's tax structure, potentially alleviating a financial burden from businesses that are subject to this tax. The impact of HB 333 on state laws is substantial as it seeks to eliminate the annual corporation franchise tax which is levied at various rates based on the corporation's taxable capital. By repealing this tax, the state may experience a decline in its overall tax revenue, which has been projected to be around $79 million in general fund revenue. However, proponents of the bill argue that this repeal could stimulate economic growth by encouraging more businesses to operate in Louisiana, thus potentially offsetting the revenue loss through increased economic activity and job creation. Sentiments surrounding the bill appear to vary widely among stakeholders. Supporters, primarily from the business community and certain legislative members, advocate for the repeal as a means of reducing operational costs for businesses, thereby fostering a more competitive economic landscape. They posit that removing this tax would promote investment and attract new companies to Louisiana. Conversely, opponents raise concerns over the possible negative implications for state revenues, suggesting that the removal of such a tax might weaken the state's financial resources necessary for public services and infrastructure. Discussions about HB 333 also reveal notable points of contention, particularly regarding the balance between fostering a pro-business environment and maintaining adequate state funding. Opponents question whether the potential benefits of stimulating economic activity will be enough to compensate for the loss of tax revenue. This ongoing debate highlights the critical tension between fiscal responsibility and economic development that is central to discussions in the legislative landscape.