Louisiana Senate Bill SCR78

Louisiana 2013 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/13/13
• Refer: 5/14/13
• Report Pass: 5/22/13
• Passed: 5/23/13
• Engrossed: 5/23/13
• Refer: 5/28/13
• Report Pass: 5/29/13

Caption

Requests joint study of the appropriate use of campaign funds and the administration and enforcement of laws within the jurisdiction of the Board of Ethics.

Impact

SCR78 is expected to lead to a thorough evaluation of the Campaign Finance Disclosure Act (CFDA) and its effectiveness in regulating campaign finance. By addressing potential loopholes and making recommendations for better enforcement, the resolution seeks to ensure that campaign funds are used appropriately and that ethical standards are upheld. The outcome of the joint committee's findings could influence potential amendments to existing campaign finance laws and the operations of the Board of Ethics.

Summary

Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 78 (SCR78) calls for a joint study by the Senate and House Committees on Governmental Affairs to explore the appropriate use of campaign funds and the enforcement of laws under the jurisdiction of the Board of Ethics. The resolution emphasizes the importance of reviewing existing laws and ensuring their proper implementation to prevent misuse and promote ethical standards among elected officials. This initiative aims to enhance transparency and accountability in campaign finance practices within the state.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SCR78 appears to be largely supportive, as it aims to reinforce ethical conduct among public officials and improve oversight in campaign finance. Lawmakers from various backgrounds recognize the need for proper regulation in this area to uphold public trust in the electoral process. While the resolution does not seem to provoke significant contention, it signifies a proactive approach toward addressing concerns over transparency and accountability in the political arena.

Contention

While the resolution is primarily a call for study rather than a contentious legislative push, potential points of contention could arise during discussions on specific recommendations made by the joint committee. Some lawmakers may advocate for stricter regulations on campaign finance usage, while others might argue against excessive restrictions that could limit the effectiveness of campaign funding. The discussions could also touch on the balance between promoting transparency and protecting the rights of candidates to manage their campaigns without undue interference.