Louisiana 2014 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB114

Introduced
3/10/14  
Refer
3/10/14  
Report Pass
4/8/14  

Caption

Extends the time within which to commence a lawsuit in certain civil cases

Impact

The extension of the prescriptive period is anticipated to enhance the prospects of claimants seeking compensation for injuries by allowing them more time to collect evidence, seek legal counsel, and prepare their cases. This change could lead to increased filings of lawsuits in civil courts as more individuals are likely to feel empowered to pursue their claims. Additionally, it may assist in cases involving minors or individuals under legal interdiction, as these groups are noted exceptions in the proposed law concerning permanent disabilities and product liability actions. The overall aim is to create a more equitable legal environment for those who have suffered harm.

Summary

House Bill 114 seeks to extend the liberative prescriptive period for delictual actions from one year to two years. This change is significant as it allows individuals additional time to initiate lawsuits related to personal injuries or damages sustained. The bill modifies existing Louisiana civil law by enacting Article 3493.11, which establishes this new two-year period, while also repealing the previous Article 3492 that set the limit at one year. The intent of this legislation is to provide greater access to justice for claimants who may find it challenging to meet the prior time constraints imposed by the shorter prescriptive period.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 114 appears to be supportive among various stakeholders who advocate for the rights of injured parties. Many believe that this extension will address concerns about rushed decisions or inadequate preparation time during the litigation process. However, there may also be apprehensions from insurance companies and defendants who fear an influx of litigation arising from the extended period, potentially leading to higher settlement amounts or longer litigation timelines. The discussions around the bill reflect a balance between protecting individual rights and maintaining a fair legal framework.

Contention

While there is considerable support for extending the prescriptive period, some contention may arise concerning the implications of such a change on the legal system. Opponents may argue that extending the time to file a lawsuit could lead to difficulties in mounting defenses due to fading memories and lost evidence over time. Additionally, concerns could be raised about the potential increase in lawsuits affecting resource allocation within the court system. Nevertheless, proponents of the bill emphasize the necessity of access to justice and the importance of giving plaintiffs adequate time to bring their claims forward.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2789

Health care practitioners: prescriptions: electronic data transmission.

CA AB852

Health care practitioners: electronic prescriptions.

CA AB149

Controlled substances: prescriptions.

TX SB594

Relating to the regulation of prescriptions for controlled substances, including certain procedures applicable to electronic prescriptions for Schedule II controlled substances.

TX HB2246

Relating to certain procedures applicable to electronic prescriptions for Schedule II controlled substances.

TX HB2766

Relating to electronic and other controlled substance prescriptions under the Texas Controlled Substances Act; authorizing a fee.