Louisiana House Bill HCR18

Louisiana 2014 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/11/14
• Refer: 3/12/14

Caption

Requests a study regarding the use of gender neutral language

Impact

The resolution's impact on state law focuses on updating the legislative language to reflect gender neutrality. By encouraging the State Law Institute to identify and suggest replacements for gender-identifying terms, HCR18 seeks to create a more inclusive legal framework. This action may foster an environment where laws are more reflective of contemporary societal values regarding gender and equality, paving the way for reforms that could alter legal interpretations and applications in Louisiana.

Summary

HCR18, introduced by Representative Tim Burns, is a resolution that requests the Louisiana State Law Institute to conduct a comprehensive study on the use of gender-specific language in Louisiana law. The resolution calls for the evaluation of terminology that currently denotes gender in legal contexts, with the aim of proposing alternative gender-neutral terms to be used in future legislative processes. This is part of a broader movement to ensure fairness and equality and aligns with the constitutional mandate that prohibits discrimination based on sex.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment around HCR18 is positive among supporters who view it as a necessary step toward promoting gender equality within the framework of Louisiana law. Advocates argue that adopting gender-neutral language is crucial for fostering an inclusive society. However, there may also be opposition from conservative factions who might perceive the resolution as part of a broader cultural shift that challenges traditional values surrounding gender.

Contention

Despite its supportive framework, the resolution could face contention related to the interpretation of gender and the ramifications of altering established legal language. There may be concerns about how such changes could affect existing statutes and whether they might unintentionally obscure specific legal protections afforded to different genders. The discussion around HCR18 may thus provoke debate about balancing inclusivity with the preservation of clear legal standards.