Recognizes Thursday, April 10th as Baton Rouge Parliamentarians Day
The resolution serves to honor the contributions of notable figures such as Thomas Jefferson and Henry Martyn Robert, whose works have greatly influenced the practice of parliamentary procedure. This designation showcases the importance of structured processes in public and private dialogues, fostering a culture of respect and order. Additionally, it reflects an acknowledgment of the National Association of Parliamentarians' designation of April as Parliamentary Law Month, further promoting awareness of these procedures across communities.
House Resolution 70 recognizes April 10, 2014, as Baton Rouge Parliamentarians Day, coinciding with the month that celebrates Thomas Jefferson's legacy as the author of the first American manual of parliamentary procedure. The resolution highlights the significance of effective parliamentary procedures in promoting civil discourse, protecting individual rights, ensuring fairness, and maintaining order during meetings. This observance also marks the thirtieth anniversary of the Baton Rouge Unit of Parliamentarians, emphasizing their role in educating leaders in the state on effective meeting management.
Overall, the sentiment surrounding HR70 is positive, as it seeks to acknowledge the essential role that parliamentary procedures play in facilitating effective governance and community engagement. It demonstrates a commitment by the Louisiana House of Representatives to uphold and honor the traditions of parliamentary practice. The recognition of Baton Rouge Parliamentarians Day is seen as an opportunity to celebrate and educate members of the community about the significance of these procedures.
While House Resolution 70 does not present significant points of contention due to its nature as a commemorative resolution, discussions may arise regarding the applicability and relevance of parliamentary procedures in modern governance. Supporters see this resolution as a vital reminder of the democratic processes essential for civil society, whereas some may question the emphasis on formal parliamentary procedures versus more adaptable governance methods.