Louisiana House Bill HB653

Louisiana 2015 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/3/15
• Refer: 4/3/15
• Refer: 4/13/15
• Report Pass: 5/12/15
• Engrossed: 5/20/15
• Refer: 5/21/15

Caption

Provides relative to exemptions from the requirements for school instructional time under certain circumstances

Impact

The implications of HB 653 are significant for local education authorities as it grants them more autonomy in managing instructional time during crisis situations. This change could potentially reduce bureaucratic delays that schools might encounter when attempting to comply with state requirements after a disaster. The bill retains the provision that the entire school system can only be considered when every school within that system is forced to close, ensuring that partial closures do not exempt any institutions from accountability in meeting instructional time.

Summary

House Bill 653, introduced during the 2015 Regular Session, aims to address the applicability of minimum instructional time requirements for public schools in Louisiana when schools face closures due to natural catastrophes or disasters. The bill modifies existing regulations, specifically removing the need for approval from the State Board of Elementary and Secondary Education (BESE) for school closures caused by such events. Instead, it allows for the approval to be provided solely by the state superintendent, streamlining the process for local school systems facing difficulties due to unforeseen circumstances.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 653 appears to be largely supportive among legislators who value efficient responses to educational challenges posed by natural disasters. There is recognition that local leaders should have the flexibility to manage school operations in response to emergencies without excessive red tape. However, there may be concerns among critics regarding the removal of checks on the state superintendent’s power, fearing that it could lead to inconsistencies in how educational standards are upheld across different districts.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding HB 653 center on the balance of power between state and local governance in educational matters. While supporters argue that the bill enhances local control and responsiveness, critics might assert that it undermines the role of BESE in maintaining oversight over educational standards. Additionally, the implications of allowing the state superintendent alone to approve school closures could raise questions about the adequacy of accountability measures in maintaining instructional quality amid crises.