Louisiana House Bill HB156

Louisiana 2016 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/24/16
• Refer: 2/24/16
• Refer: 3/14/16
• Report Pass: 4/13/16

Caption

(Constitutional Amendment) Reduces the number of certain matters that may be filed in regular sessions in odd-numbered years

Impact

The proposed amendment is designed to streamline the legislative process by reducing the number of extraneous matters that can be considered during pivotal sessions. Proponents argue that this will focus legislative attention on issues of greater importance, facilitate a more orderly legislative agenda, and ultimately improve the effectiveness of the state's governance. However, the restriction could also hinder the ability of legislators to address emerging issues that may not fit neatly within existing subject matter categories, leading to potential gaps in representation and advocacy for local interests.

Summary

House Bill 156 proposes an amendment to the Louisiana Constitution that seeks to reduce the number of matters a legislator may file during regular sessions convened in odd-numbered years. Currently, lawmakers can prefile up to five matters that are not within the subject matter limitations during these sessions, but HB156 aims to limit this number to two. This change is significant as it alters the legislative process and the capacity for members to introduce new matters outside the conventional framework, with implications for governance and legislative efficiency in Louisiana.

Sentiment

The sentiment regarding HB156 reflects a division among lawmakers and constituents. Supporters of the bill generally view it as a necessary step towards refining the legislative process and promoting discipline within the legislature. Critics, however, contend that limiting the number of matters could stifle necessary innovation and responsiveness to constituent needs. This conflict highlights a broader tension between the desire for streamlined governance and the need for comprehensive and responsive legislative representation.

Contention

The bill's primary contention lies in its effect on the legislative dynamics in Louisiana. Critics argue that reducing the number of prefiled matters could prevent legislators from adequately responding to local issues that arise during session, particularly those not fitting within established categories. Meanwhile, supporters maintain that such a measure is essential for enhancing legislative focus and efficiency. The upcoming vote on this amendment is expected to elicit significant debate, given its potential long-term implications for legislative practices in Louisiana.