Appropriates funds for payment of judgment in the matter of "Henrey Clark & Denise Ramsey v. State of Louisiana, through the Department of Transportation and Development, Lafayette City Parish Consolidated Government"
Impact
The passing of HB 954 will ensure that the state meets its obligation arising from the judicial judgment, reflecting a commitment to uphold the outcomes of legal proceedings against it. By providing these funds, the state reaffirms its responsibility to settle litigation matters, which may set a precedent for future appropriations related to legal settlements. This has implications for state budget allocations, potentially influencing how funds are managed in future fiscal years, especially concerning similar legal judgments.
Summary
House Bill 954 addresses the appropriation of funds from the state general fund for the fiscal year 2016-2017. The bill specifically allocates a total of $326,000 to pay a consent judgment resulting from a lawsuit titled 'Henrey Clark and Denise Ramsey v. State of Louisiana, through the Department of Transportation and Development, Lafayette City Parish Consolidated Government'. Of this amount, $276,000 is designated for the plaintiffs, Henrey Clark and Denise Ramsey, and $50,000 is allocated for the intervenor, Our Lady of Lourdes Regional Medical Center.
Sentiment
The general sentiment surrounding HB 954 appears to be procedural and largely neutral, as it does not propose significant changes to existing laws but rather addresses financial obligations resulting from legal decisions. Legislators likely viewed the bill as a necessary fulfillment of the state’s commitments rather than a matter of contentious policy debate, leading to minimal opposition during its consideration.
Contention
Although HB 954 does not introduce major policy debates, it nonetheless underscores broader discussions regarding state accountability in legal matters. The necessity for appropriating funds for legal settlements brings to light the continued costs the state faces due to various legal actions, prompting ongoing discussions about legal reforms and fiscal responsibility.
Appropriates funds for payment of judgment against DOTD in the matter of "Denise Ebanks v. The State of Louisiana, Department of Transportation and Development, et al."
Appropriates funds for payment of judgment in the matter of "Steve Brengettsy, et al v. the State of Louisiana through the Department of Transportation and Development, et al"
Appropriates funds for payment of judgment in the matter of "Steven Melancon v. State of Louisiana through the Department of Transportation and Development, et al."
Appropriates funds for payment of judgment in the matter of "Jennie Lynn Badeaux Russ, et al v The State of Louisiana, through the Department of Transportation and Development"
Appropriates funds for payment of judgment in the matter of "Melissa Maturin v. State of Louisiana, through the Department of Transportation and Development, parish and/or City of New Iberia"
Appropriates funds for payment of judgment in the matter of "Angela Harris, et al. v. State of Louisiana, Department of Transportation and Development"
Appropriates funds for payment of judgments against the Department of Transportation and Development in the matter of "Keith Phillips v. Pattie K. Inzenga, et al" consolidated with "Robert H. Fuqua, et al v. City-Parish of Baton Rouge"
Appropriates funds for payment in the matter of "Pamela Adams and Michael Adams v. State of Louisiana, through the Department of Transportation and Development"