Applies to the U.S. Congress to call a convention for the purpose of proposing amendments to the U.S. Constitution to address concerns raised by the 2010 decision of the Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission
Should HCR13 be enacted, it signifies a significant step towards addressing perceived imbalances created by the Citizens United decision. The resolution explicitly states that the intended amendments would seek to limit the power of economic forces in politics. By proposing such a convention, Louisiana aims to reclaim a degree of autonomy over electoral processes and restore what supporters believe to be fairer controls on campaign financing and independent expenditures.
HCR13 is a Concurrent Resolution from the Louisiana Legislature that applies to the U.S. Congress to call a convention under Article V of the U.S. Constitution. The primary purpose of this convention would be to propose amendments addressing the issues raised by the Supreme Court's decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, which lifted restrictions on independent political spending. This resolution reflects concerns about the influence of money in politics and its potential to undermine democratic processes.
The sentiment surrounding HCR13 is quite polarized. Proponents, mainly from within the state legislature, view this resolution as a necessary avenue to combat the overwhelming influence of wealth in elections, advocating for a political landscape that prioritizes the voices of individual citizens over corporations. Conversely, critics may express concerns about the risks associated with calling a convention, including the unpredictability of the amendments that could arise from it, potentially leading to alterations that extend beyond intended reforms.
Notably, HCR13 specifies that delegates to this convention should be selected from currently elected state and local officials, or via election in congressional districts, while preventing any individuals previously elected to federal office from serving as delegates. This stipulation raises questions regarding the representation and inclusivity of the process. Additionally, the resolution asserts Louisiana's desire to retain the ability to limit or expand the power of its delegates, highlighting an effort to ensure state interests remain at the forefront of any proposed constitutional changes.