Louisiana 2017 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB292

Introduced
3/30/17  
Refer
3/30/17  
Refer
4/10/17  

Caption

(Constitutional Amendment) Prohibits various public actions relating to monuments, memorials, and artifacts

Impact

If enacted, this amendment would significantly solidify the legal foundation for the protection of historic monuments and memorials in Louisiana. It would prevent state and local governments from acting against such artifacts, which could have a direct impact on local decisions regarding historical preservation. Supporters argue that the amendment is necessary to protect the state's heritage and ensure that significant cultural artifacts are preserved for future generations, while opponents may view it as an impediment to local governance and adaptation to modern values concerning historical representation.

Summary

HB292 is a proposed constitutional amendment that seeks to prohibit public entities in Louisiana from destroying, dismantling, removing, moving, storing, or hiding various historic monuments, memorials, and artifacts. The amendment specifically recognizes the right of citizens to preserve their historic linguistic and cultural origins and aims to protect items related to the American Revolution and U.S. wars from governmental actions that could lead to their elimination. This bill directly amends Article XII, Section 4 of the Louisiana Constitution and will be submitted to voters for approval during the statewide election.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB292 is likely to be deeply divided. Proponents of the bill, including various civic groups and historical societies, see it as a crucial step toward safeguarding the state's rich history and cultural identity. On the other hand, critics argue that the measure could prevent necessary discussions about the appropriateness of certain monuments and hinder efforts to address the legacy of contentious historical figures. This clash of sentiments reflects broader societal debates about how history is remembered and commemorated.

Contention

Notable points of contention include concerns from various community groups regarding the implications of the bill for social justice and historical representation. While supporters emphasize the importance of preserving all historical artifacts, opponents caution that some monuments may symbolize oppressive historical narratives, and thus their unqualified protection could stifle necessary conversations about race, history, and public space. These competing viewpoints highlight the complexities of historical preservation and the need for a balanced approach to managing public memory.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

WV HB3332

Creating judicial circuits and assigning the number of circuit judges in each circuit to be elected in the 2024 election

WV HB3330

Creating family court circuits and assigning the number of family court judges in each family court circuit to be elected in the 2024 election

WV HB3329

Creating judicial circuits and assigning the number of circuit judges in each circuit to be elected in the 2024 election

NJ SCR72

Proposes constitutional amendment authorizing Legislature to invalidate certain court decisions.

NJ SCR73

Proposes constitutional amendment authorizing Legislature to invalidate certain court decisions.

NJ SCR83

Proposes temporary constitutional amendment allowing State constitutional convention convened to reform system of property taxation to propose statutory changes.

NJ SCR96

Proposes temporary constitutional amendment allowing State constitutional convention convened to reform system of property taxation to propose statutory changes.

CA ACA13

Voting thresholds.