Louisiana 2017 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB653

Introduced
4/19/17  
Introduced
4/19/17  
Refer
4/20/17  
Refer
4/20/17  
Report Pass
5/8/17  

Caption

Provides relative to corporate income tax deductions (EG +$16,500,000 GF RV See Note)

Impact

The implications of HB 653 are significant for corporate entities within Louisiana. By maintaining these tax exclusions and deductions, corporations, particularly in the oil, gas, and public transportation sectors, will continue to benefit from reduced tax liabilities, which could support economic activity and investment in these industries. The amendments to the depletion allowances may incentivize oil and gas companies to increase production, thereby contributing positively to job creation and local economies. Additionally, maintaining these tax benefits could make Louisiana more attractive for business operations, fostering a more favorable economic climate for corporate growth.

Summary

House Bill 653, proposed by Representative Broadwater, aims to repeal the sunset provision for several reductions in corporate income tax exclusions and deductions that were established under Act No. 123 of the 2015 Regular Session. By removing this sunset, the bill ensures the continued effectiveness of these tax benefits, which primarily focus on excluding certain funds received from governmental entities for subsidizing public transportation systems and offering deductions for net operating losses. The bill further amends the percentage depletion available for oil and gas production, adjusting the depletion rate from 15.8% to 16%. This maintains and expands the tax relief available to corporations operating within these sectors.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 653 appears to be generally favorable among business communities, particularly those aligned with sectors benefiting from the tax reliefs. Advocates for business-friendly tax policies often support measures that provide financial incentives to corporations, viewing them as essential for stimulating economic growth. In contrast, some opponents may express concerns regarding the potential loss of state revenue tied to these corporate tax deductions, questioning the long-term sustainability of such policies and the fairness of their distribution across various sectors within the economy.

Contention

While proponents argue that HB 653 is critical for maintaining a competitive business environment, critics may voice concerns about the implications for state budgets and essential public services that could be affected by reduced tax revenues. The continuation of these tax deductions has raised questions about the equitable treatment of different business sectors and the potential for corporations to disproportionately benefit from state policies. The discussions around the bill suggest a deeper tension between supporting economic development through tax incentives and ensuring adequate funding for public services reliant on stable tax revenues.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2013

Property taxation: new construction: damaged or destroyed property.

CA AB1500

Property taxation: application of base year value: disaster relief.

CA AB245

Property taxation: application of base year value: disaster relief.

DC B25-0486

Uniform Community Property Disposition at Death Act of 2023

CA SB964

Property tax: tax-defaulted property sales.

CA SB603

Property taxation: transfer of base year value: disaster relief.

CA SB1091

Property taxation: transfer of base year value: disaster relief.

HI HB1398

Relating To Property.