Provides relative to per diem for the Rapides Parish Sewerage District No. 2. (8/1/17) (EN +$6,480 LF RV See Note)
The enactment of SB5 would alter existing statutes regarding the remuneration of board members, providing clearer guidelines for payments associated with attendance. By establishing a formal allowance for per diem payments, it addresses the need for financial recognition of board service that plays a vital role in local infrastructure management. This could lead to increased accountability and engagement among board members, ultimately benefiting the governance of the sewerage district.
Senate Bill No. 5, introduced by Senator Luneau, focuses on amending the regulations related to Sewerage District No. 2 of Rapides Parish. The bill authorizes the governing authority of Rapides Parish to pay board members of the supervisory board a per diem for their attendance at meetings. Specifically, this per diem is capped at one hundred fifty dollars for each attended meeting, with provisions for up to twenty-four regular meetings and twelve emergency sessions within a calendar year. This amendment seeks to ensure proper compensation for board members and incentivize their participation in essential governance activities.
Overall, the sentiment surrounding SB5 appears positive, with no recorded opposition during the legislative process. The bill passed unanimously in the House with a vote tally of 94-0, indicating strong bipartisan support. Lawmakers recognized the necessity of compensating local board members for their time and efforts. This consensus suggests a shared understanding of the importance of local governance and the challenges that volunteer board members face in managing district affairs.
Although the bill primarily focuses on financial compensation, any potential contention may arise from discussions about funding sources for the per diem payments and the overall budget for the sewerage district. Additionally, while the measure seems straightforward, there may be concerns from local taxpayers about the appropriateness of using public funds for board member payments. However, the bill does include provisions to ensure that payments come from designated funds, addressing these fiscal accountability concerns.