(Constitutional Amendment) Provides relative to the holding of public office and public employment
Impact
If enacted, the bill would have significant implications on the state's approach to age in relation to public office. The removal of the mandatory retirement age for judges would allow experienced judges to continue serving without age-related limitations. This could lead to a broader interpretation of employment rights for older public officials across Louisiana, thereby promoting inclusivity and potentially retaining valuable judicial experience. Additionally, the proposed amendment would amend both Articles V and X of the Louisiana Constitution, reinforcing the rights of individuals seeking public employment regardless of age.
Summary
House Bill 203 seeks to amend the Louisiana Constitution by prohibiting discrimination in public office and employment based solely on age. Specifically, the bill aims to remove the mandatory retirement age for judges, which currently requires them to retire by the age of 70. This change allows judges who reach 70 years while in office to complete their terms, thus potentially extending their service. The proposed amendment will be submitted to Louisiana voters for consideration in a statewide election scheduled for November 6, 2018.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding HB 203 appears to be mixed. Proponents argue that the bill supports experienced judges and upholds their right to serve without age discrimination, reflecting a progressive stance on employment rights. In contrast, opponents may express concerns about the implications of an aging judiciary and advocate for regular turnover to ensure fresh perspectives within the judicial system. The debate highlights the tension between valuing experience and the necessity of rejuvenating public office through age-related policies.
Contention
Notable points of contention regarding HB 203 revolve around the age limits set for judges and the broader implications of removing such limits. Supporters argue that judicial competence should not be tied to age, while critics contend that an aging bench may not adequately reflect the demographic and social shifts of the constituents they serve. Furthermore, the amendment prompts discussions about the balance between experience and modernity within the judiciary, indicating a conflict between traditional practices and evolving societal values regarding age and capability.
Constitutional amendment to remove the mandatory retirement age for judges and to prohibit a mandatory retirement age for public office holders and public employment.
Proposes temporary constitutional amendment allowing State constitutional convention convened to reform system of property taxation to propose statutory changes.
Proposes temporary constitutional amendment allowing State constitutional convention convened to reform system of property taxation to propose statutory changes.