(Constitutional Amendment) Provides relative to the holding of public office and public employment
If enacted, HB 178 would remove the age cap that currently limits judges' tenure based solely on their age. This means that judges could potentially serve well beyond 70, provided they are competent and willing to continue in their roles. Additionally, the proposed amendment to prohibit age-based discrimination could have broader implications for all public employees, significantly impacting hiring and retention practices within state and local government positions.
House Bill 178 aims to amend the Louisiana Constitution to eliminate the mandatory retirement age for judges and prohibit age discrimination in public office and employment. Currently, the law mandates that judges retire upon reaching 70 years of age, although they are allowed to serve out their current term if they turn 70 while in office. This bill seeks to give voters the opportunity to decide whether age should be a factor in determining eligibility for public office or employment, with the proposed amendment set to be voted on in a statewide election scheduled for October 12, 2019.
The sentiment surrounding HB 178 appears to be mixed. Supporters argue that the bill promotes inclusivity and recognizes the value of experience in public service, allowing qualified judges to continue their service regardless of age. Opponents, however, may express concerns about potential implications for judicial independence and effectiveness, questioning whether age should be a consideration for candidates in public office based on perceptions of capability and vitality.
The most notable point of contention within the discussions surrounding HB 178 is the balance between preserving judicial independence and ensuring that public office holders remain capable. Critics of removing the retirement age for judges may argue that extending service beyond a certain age could impede the judiciary's rejuvenation with new ideas and perspectives. The debate also reflects broader societal views on aging and capability, highlighting differing opinions on whether age should impact eligibility for public positions.