Provides relative to court costs in suits involving the state and state agencies in the Nineteenth Judicial District Court. (8/1/19) (RE INCREASE GF EX See Note)
One of the notable provisions of SB111 is the requirement for state entities to pay an advance filing fee of $200 when initiating suits in the Nineteenth Judicial District. This amendment limits the applicability of temporary cost deferrals, which previously encompassed a broader range of governmental bodies. The bill emphasizes the state's ability to manage its legal costs more effectively while also ensuring that the funds needed to cover these costs are available when required. It lays a foundation for how financial responsibilities are handled in state-related legal matters.
Senate Bill 111 aims to amend existing laws pertaining to court costs in cases involving the state and its agencies within the Nineteenth Judicial District Court. The bill introduces provisions that allow the state, its political subdivisions, and governmental agents to temporarily defer court costs in judicial proceedings. This is a significant change aimed at streamlining financial obligations for the state during legal disputes, particularly regarding costs associated with filing judgments against the state.
The sentiment surrounding the bill appears to be largely positive among its proponents, including various legislative members who see it as a necessary step towards improving efficiency in the state’s judicial processes. However, there may be concerns regarding the implications for smaller governmental bodies that could be impacted by the changes in fee structures and deferral capabilities, leading to discussions about access to justice and state support for local entities.
Some contention may arise around the limitation of cost deferrals and the advance fee requirement, especially regarding the ability of smaller political subdivisions to manage sudden financial obligations tied to legal proceedings. Critics may argue that while the intent of the bill is to foster a more manageable system for large state entities, it could unintentionally burden smaller municipalities or agencies that may lack the financial resources to cover advance fees.