Louisiana 2019 Regular Session

Louisiana Senate Bill SB136

Introduced
3/27/19  
Introduced
3/27/19  
Refer
3/27/19  
Refer
3/27/19  
Refer
4/8/19  
Refer
4/8/19  

Caption

Provides with respect to wage secrecy and pay discrimination. (8/1/19)

Impact

If enacted, SB 136 would significantly alter the landscape of employment law by embedding wage disclosure rights into state law. Employers would be prohibited from instituting policies or agreements that silence employee discussions about pay, aiming to empower workers and foster an environment where wage practices can be openly scrutinized. The bill seeks to mitigate wage discrimination and promote equality, making it unlawful for employers to retaliate against employees for disclosing wage information or facilitating discussions among employees regarding compensation.

Summary

Senate Bill 136 addresses wage secrecy and discrimination in the workplace by specifically prohibiting practices that prevent employees from discussing or disclosing their wages. The bill amends existing employment law in Louisiana, adding protections for employees who inquire about or share their wage information. It aims to combat wage discrimination by promoting transparency in salary discussions, empowering employees to ensure they are compensated fairly relative to their peers. This legislation reflects a growing national trend toward wage transparency meant to help reduce disparities in pay along gender and racial lines.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB 136 appears generally supportive, particularly among advocates for wage equity and labor rights. Supporters argue that the legislation is a necessary step toward achieving fair pay practices and supporting a more equitable workplace. However, there may be concerns from some employers regarding the implications of enforced transparency on their operational practices. The bill reflects an acknowledgment of the importance of addressing wage gaps that persist in many industries, primarily affecting women and people of color.

Contention

Notable points of contention include potential pushback from employers who may view the bill as an intrusion into their business operations. Critics may argue that enforced wage discussions could lead to workplace discord or unfair comparisons among employees. Additionally, there is the consideration of how the bill aligns with existing employment practices that permit differing pay based on seniority or production metrics. The challenge lies in balancing employee rights to wage information without disrupting the existing frameworks that businesses utilize for compensation strategies.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB933

Privileged communications: incident of sexual assault, harassment, or discrimination.

CA AB2239

Digital discrimination of access: prohibition.

CA AB831

Housing discrimination.

CA AB518

Discrimination: state employees: travel.

CA SB16

Civil rights: discrimination: enforcement.

CA AB2389

Discrimination: state employees: travel.

CA AB2925

Postsecondary education: Equity in Higher Education Act: prohibition on discrimination: training.

CA AB2048

Community colleges: systemic campus reforms: sexual harassment: report.