Designates Tuesday, April 16, 2019, as LSU Day at the Legislature.
The resolution serves to celebrate LSU's contributions to Louisiana's economy, asserting that the university generates over $5.1 billion in total sales and provides around 41,000 jobs statewide. The financial return on the state’s investment in LSU is notably emphasized, with each dollar yielding an estimated $13.25 in economic activity. This economic contribution underlines how essential LSU is to the well-being of the state, particularly in improving quality of life and supporting local communities through education and research advancements.
Senate Resolution No. 23 designates April 16, 2019, as LSU Day at the Legislature, recognizing the significant contributions of Louisiana State University (LSU) to the state. The resolution highlights LSU's status as the most comprehensive education system in Louisiana and underscores its commitment to education, research, and outreach. It draws attention to the diverse educational offerings provided by LSU across various fields, including medicine, agriculture, engineering, and the humanities. Through its extensive research portfolio and collaborations with over 100 universities and numerous industry partners, LSU is portrayed as a central institution capable of driving innovation and development in various sectors.
The sentiment surrounding SR23 is overwhelmingly positive, reflecting a sense of pride in LSU's achievements and its importance to the state of Louisiana. The resolution has wide support from legislators who recognize the university as a vital asset that not only fosters academic excellence but also drives economic growth and public service. The designation of LSU Day is seen as a means to promote awareness of the university’s ongoing efforts and successes within the community.
While SR23 promotes a unified recognition of LSU, it does not appear to present any significant points of contention. The resolution is declarative in nature, aiming solely to honor and acknowledge LSU’s contributions rather than proposing any contentious policies or changes to state law. However, it does implicitly underscore ongoing debates about funding priorities and the role of state institutions in economic development, which could be areas of future discussion.