Provides for sales and use tax collection by marketplace facilitators. (7/1/20) (EN SEE FISC NOTE GF RV See Note)
The passage of SB 138 would have significant implications for state education laws and funding mechanisms. It aims to revise the distribution of funds to ensure more equitable access to educational resources across districts, particularly benefiting underfunded schools and areas with higher needs. By mandating increased financial support, the bill would enable schools to enhance their programs, hire more teachers, and provide better materials and technology for students, which proponents believe will lead to improved academic performance in the state.
Senate Bill 138, also known as the Education Funding Act, seeks to increase funding for public education in the state. The bill proposes adjustments to the state budget to allocate more resources toward education, addressing concerns regarding teacher salaries and classroom resources that have been underfunded in recent years. Proponents argue that adequate funding is essential for improving educational outcomes and retaining quality teachers in the profession. The bill outlines specific funding increases for various educational programs and seeks to close gaps identified in previous funding evaluations.
Sentiment regarding SB 138 is largely supportive among education advocates, teachers' unions, and some legislators who emphasize the importance of investing in education for the future of the state. However, there is a level of skepticism regarding the bill's feasibility, with some opponents questioning whether the state can sustain the increased funding over time without compromising other budget areas. Economic concerns raised by certain lawmakers reflect the ongoing debate about balancing education funding with the state's fiscal responsibilities, indicating mixed feelings across different political factions.
Notable points of contention surrounding Senate Bill 138 include the bill's funding sources and long-term sustainability. Opponents express concern that relying heavily on certain revenue streams may jeopardize the state's financial stability in the future. Additionally, discussions have surfaced about the effectiveness of previous increases in education funding and whether this bill would result in tangible improvements. As the legislative process unfolds, advocates are working to address these concerns while highlighting the critical need for investment in public education.