Louisiana 2020 Regular Session

Louisiana Senate Bill SB476

Introduced
3/31/20  
Refer
5/4/20  
Refer
5/4/20  
Report Pass
5/7/20  
Report Pass
5/7/20  
Engrossed
5/15/20  
Engrossed
5/15/20  
Report Pass
5/21/20  

Caption

Provides relative to third-party sellers on the online marketplace. (8/1/20)

Impact

The implementation of SB 476 is poised to significantly affect the online retail environment by ensuring that consumers can verify the identity of sellers, thereby building a layer of trust in digital transactions. The enforcement of strict penalties for violations, deemed as unfair trade practices, ensures compliance from online marketplaces and their sellers. By establishing these regulations, the bill contributes to a broader effort to curb counterfeit products and protect consumer rights, ultimately aiming for a safer online shopping experience.

Summary

Senate Bill 476 aims to regulate third-party sellers within online marketplaces by imposing identification and verification requirements to enhance consumer protection. The bill mandates that high-volume third-party sellers must provide verifiable bank account information, government-issued identification, and other pertinent information when listing products on an online platform. This initiative seeks to prevent the proliferation of counterfeit goods and ensure that consumers have access to reliable information about the sellers they engage with in online transactions.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 476 appears to be generally positive among consumer advocacy groups, as they view the bill as a necessary step towards better ensuring consumer safety and protection from fraudulent activities. However, concerns have been raised regarding the impact of these regulations on smaller sellers who may struggle to meet the stringent compliance demands, raising discussions about balancing enforcement with the need to support small businesses operating in online spaces.

Contention

Notable points of contention around SB 476 include debates about potential overreach in regulatory compliance that may hinder small businesses or independent sellers from participating effectively in online marketplaces. While the intention is to create a more secure environment for consumers, stakeholders argue about the complexity of the verification process and the fear that it could lead to an unfair competitive advantage for larger, more established sellers who can manage the compliance burdens more easily.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1790

Marketplaces: marketplace sellers.

CA AB1402

Marketplace facilitator: fee collection.

MI SB0930

Sales tax: other; nexus of marketplace facilitators; clarify. Amends sec. 2d of 1933 PA 167 (MCL 205.52d).

MI HB5745

Sales tax: other; nexus of marketplace facilitators; clarify. Amends sec. 2d of 1933 PA 167 (MCL 205.52d).

MI SB0229

Sales tax: other; deduction or exclusion and audit of qualified delivery network sales; provide for. Amends sec. 2d of 1933 PA 167 (MCL 205.52d).

MI HB5746

Sales tax: collections; certain requirements imposed on marketplace facilitators related to tax collections; provide exceptions and waivers. Amends sec. 5c of 1937 PA 94 (MCL 205.95c).

CA SB301

Marketplaces: online marketplaces.

CA SB1312

Marketplace facilitators: passenger vehicle rental companies.