Louisiana 2020 Regular Session

Louisiana Senate Bill SB328

Introduced
2/28/20  
Introduced
2/28/20  
Refer
2/28/20  
Refer
2/28/20  
Refer
3/9/20  

Caption

Provides relative to race for discrimination purposes. (8/1/20)

Impact

The enactment of SB328 will change the legal landscape concerning workplace grooming policies in Louisiana by expanding the definition of race under the state’s discrimination laws. This means that employers will be restricted from implementing dress codes that penalize employees for their natural hairstyles, fostering a more inclusive environment. The bill aligns with broader movements to promote diversity and equity within professional settings, aiming to dismantle barriers that discourage Black individuals from seeking employment.

Summary

Senate Bill 328 (SB328), introduced by Senator Barrow, addresses the issue of discrimination based on hairstyles that are culturally or historically associated with race, specifically targeting practices that disproportionately affect Black individuals. The bill asserts that grooming policies prohibiting natural hairstyles such as afros, braids, twists, and locks serve to perpetuate racial discrimination in the workplace. As such, it aims to amend Louisiana's existing laws regarding discrimination to explicitly include these traits under legal protection.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB328 has largely been supportive, particularly from advocacy groups focused on racial equity and workplace inclusion. Proponents argue that the bill represents a significant step toward dismantling systemic racism in employment practices. However, there may be some contention related to how businesses will adapt to these changes and concerns about potential backlash from those who view such legislation as unnecessary.

Contention

Notable points of contention include debates over the implications of enforcing such laws in workplaces that historically adhere to Eurocentric standards of professionalism. Critics may argue that SB328 could lead to unintended consequences, such as additional litigation or constraints on employer discretion regarding dress codes. Ultimately, the effectiveness of the bill may hinge on its implementation and the willingness of employers to embrace a broader definition of professionalism that respects cultural identity.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB933

Privileged communications: incident of sexual assault, harassment, or discrimination.

CA AB2239

Digital discrimination of access: prohibition.

NJ AR49

Condemns US Department of Housing and Urban Development's proposed rule limiting applicability of Fair Housing Act's disparate impact standard.

CA AB831

Housing discrimination.

CA AB518

Discrimination: state employees: travel.

CA SB16

Civil rights: discrimination: enforcement.

CA AB2389

Discrimination: state employees: travel.

CA AB2925

Postsecondary education: Equity in Higher Education Act: prohibition on discrimination: training.